Skip to content

King & Wood Mallesons Pulse

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • International Arbitration
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

King & Wood Mallesons Pulse

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • International Arbitration
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

software

Artifex Software v Hancom: Guidance from US District Court on enforcement of open source software licences

Artifex Software v Hancom: Guidance from US District Court on enforcement of open source software licences

30 May 2017
By Prue Buckland
Open source software is regularly used as a way of leveraging the collective knowledge of the software development community by allowing anyone to improve and contribute to the code, provided they ‘pay it forward’ and allow their improved code to be used by the community.
Read on
How many codes must a man walk down? Coding and copyright cross paths in the FCA

How many codes must a man walk down? Coding and copyright cross paths in the FCA

6 March 2017
By James MacLeod
For most of us, our exposure to software code is limited to the Matrix and those terrifying moments when you accidentally open Terminal on your Mac.
Read on
Big data, big risk – investing in a “largely theoretical” industry

Big data, big risk – investing in a “largely theoretical” industry

24 February 2017
By Priscilla Hejtmanek
Between 31 May 2012 and 26 March 2013, an Australian husband and wife (Mr and Ms Vinson), through their self-managed superannuation funds, invested $1,250,000 and $1,625,000 respectively in a company that never earned any operating revenue.
Read on
Productivity Commission’s final report pulls no punches on patents

Productivity Commission’s final report pulls no punches on patents

21 December 2016
By David Fixler
Yesterday the Productivity Commission published its final report on Australia’s IP system.
Read on
Aristocrat v Global Gaming – it’s all fun and games until someone infringes a trade mark

Aristocrat v Global Gaming – it’s all fun and games until someone infringes a trade mark

14 April 2016
By Katie Dillon
The Federal Court’s decision in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Global Gaming Supplies Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC marks the end* of a long-running dispute between the Aristocrat Technologies group and Global Gaming Supplies, Impact Gaming and Tonia Enterprises.
Read on
500 versions of software – when is a new version of software original and when does copyright subsist?

500 versions of software – when is a new version of software original and when does copyright subsist?

15 March 2016
By Anna Spies
The Full Court, in its recent decision JR Consulting & Drafting Pty Limited v Cummings [2016] FCAFC 20 tackled some difficult questions of subsistence of copyright and originality.
Read on
Unanimous Full Court dismisses Research Affiliates’ appeal

Unanimous Full Court dismisses Research Affiliates’ appeal

10 November 2014
By James Ellsmore
In a decision handed down this afternoon, the Full Court has unanimously dismissed an appeal by Research Affiliates LLC from a decision of Justice Emmett in 2013 (summary here).
Read on
E-tail & the details: consumer guarantees & overseas e-tailers

E-tail & the details: consumer guarantees & overseas e-tailers

9 September 2014
By Damien MacRae
Do consumer guarantees apply to the supply of goods by companies overseas? This question has been raised by a new case brought by the ACCC.
Read on
A black and white ban on software patents in NZ? Not ‘as such’…

A black and white ban on software patents in NZ? Not ‘as such’…

5 September 2013
By Tom Zagami
Last week, proposed amendments to the Patents Act (NZ) excluding computer programs (software) from patentable subject matter met with overwhelming approval.
Read on

Speciality Blogs

  • In Competition
  • International Arbitration
  • IP Whiteboard

More From IP Whiteboard

  • IP Whiteboard

Trending Topics

  • Dispute resolution & litigation
  • Hong Kong
  • Litigation
  • Technology
View All Topics

Most Viewed

Bilateral relations for Australia & China enter a new chapter

Read More

ASIC flexes muscles in scam and phishing takedowns

Read More
King & Wood Mallesons
©2025 King & Wood Mallesons

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Subscribe to KWM Pulse
Terms of use & legal notices | Privacy statement
©2025 King & Wood Mallesons