Skip to content

King & Wood Mallesons Pulse

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • International Arbitration
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

King & Wood Mallesons Pulse

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • International Arbitration
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

appeal

The penultimate instalment in the “admissibility or jurisdiction debate” in Hong Kong: permission to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal granted in C v D

The penultimate instalment in the “admissibility or jurisdiction debate” in Hong Kong: permission to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal granted in C v D

16 January 2023
By Suraj Sajnani, Sian Knight
The Court of Final Appeal has granted leave to appeal in the case of Cv D which deals with the issue of admissibility or jurisdiction
Read on
Mazda and the ACCC race to win appeal in the Full Federal Court

Mazda and the ACCC race to win appeal in the Full Federal Court

10 May 2022
By Wilson Huang
Both the ACCC and Mazda have appealed a Federal Court decision which found that Mazda had mislead consumers but not acted unconscionably...
Read on
Appealing domestic arbitral awards in Australia: not opting out is not opting in

Appealing domestic arbitral awards in Australia: not opting out is not opting in

3 December 2020
By Lucy Forbes
This article provides a summary of Jacobs Group v Commonwealth Australia and its implications on the appeal of domestic arbitral awards in Australia
Read on
The Appeal of the Law: Singapore’s decision to hold off introduction option to appeal on point of law and other changes

The Appeal of the Law: Singapore’s decision to hold off introduction option to appeal on point of law and other changes

1 November 2020
By Patric McGonigal
The right to appeal an arbitral award on questions of law is not uncommon. Singapore has yet to adopt this right into its IAA legislation.
Read on
A very modest win: Generic Health gets 2% cut to Bayer’s $25 million damages

A very modest win: Generic Health gets 2% cut to Bayer’s $25 million damages

8 November 2018
By Esme Wong
Last year, Bayer was awarded more than $25 million (plus interest and indemnity costs) against Generic Health in the first Federal Court award of damages for pharmaceutical patent infringement.
Read on
Smells fishy: Trident Seafoods Corporation v Trident Foods Pty Limited

Smells fishy: Trident Seafoods Corporation v Trident Foods Pty Limited

19 October 2018
By Diana Liu
This recent Federal Court decision concerns two appeals by Trident Seafoods Corporation (Trident Seafoods) from decisions made by delegates of the Registrar of Trade Marks.
Read on
United States Court of Appeals upholds PTAB decision on CRISPR Patent Interference

United States Court of Appeals upholds PTAB decision on CRISPR Patent Interference

24 September 2018
By Veg Tran
Regents of the University of California & Ors v Broad Institute, Inc.
Read on
What do you know about a ‘smoking gun’?

What do you know about a ‘smoking gun’?

5 June 2018
By Tamara Hunter
The Full Court of the Federal Court has handed down its decision in the ACCC's appeal of the Pfizer case. The case considers 'smoking gun' documents.
Read on
Second throw of the dice unsuccessful: Full Federal Court confirms Hepatitis C drug patent is invalid

Second throw of the dice unsuccessful: Full Federal Court confirms Hepatitis C drug patent is invalid

21 December 2017
By Suzy Madar
The recent decision of the Full Court in Idenix Pharmaceuticals v Gilead Sciences [2017] FCAFC 196 illustrates the power of the grounds of lack of utility and lack of sufficiency under section 40 of the Patents Act when challenging the validity of a patent.
Read on
Full Court warns against dangerous affliction of parameteritis (and confirms invalidity of aripiprazole patent)

Full Court warns against dangerous affliction of parameteritis (and confirms invalidity of aripiprazole patent)

26 August 2016
By Suzy Madar
On Wednesday the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia handed down a decision in which it upheld Justice Yates’ findings that Otsuka’s patent relating to aripiprazole, a drug used in the treatment of schizophrenia, is invalid for want of novelty and inventive step. 
Read on

Speciality Blogs

  • In Competition
  • International Arbitration
  • IP Whiteboard

More From IP Whiteboard

  • IP Whiteboard

Trending Topics

  • Dispute resolution & litigation
  • Hong Kong
  • Litigation
  • Technology
View All Topics

Most Viewed

Bilateral relations for Australia & China enter a new chapter

Read More

ASIC flexes muscles in scam and phishing takedowns

Read More
King & Wood Mallesons
©2025 King & Wood Mallesons

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Subscribe to KWM Pulse
Terms of use & legal notices | Privacy statement
©2025 King & Wood Mallesons