Following the High Court’s refusal of special leave to the Commissioner of Patents on 5 February 2026, Australia now has a clear position on computer-implemented inventions (CIIs): the Full Federal Court’s September 2025 articulation of the test in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents[1] remains the settled law.
On 5 December 2025, the Federal Court of Australia granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the launch and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) listing of generic long-acting injectable (LAI) paliperidone palmitate products.
The Australian health sector is entering a transformative phase with the official launch of Genomics Australia on 1 July 2025 and a new Australian Health Genomics Commissioner.
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence and the expansion of the use of software in the delivery of healthcare is transforming the medtech landscape, offering unprecedented opportunities for innovation in patient care.
In a long, but intricately reasoned first instance judgment, Australia’s Federal Court has ruled on the validity and infringement of patents relating to wireless detonators.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) recently decided that Moderna’s mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine, SPIKEVAX®, did not infringe Alnylam’s patents because the cationic lipid used in the vaccine, SM-102, was not a cationic lipid with a ‘branched alkyl’ group.[1] The case turned on the proper construction of ‘branched alkyl’.