Advertising & marketing, Australia, Intellectual Property, Social media, Trade marks A lesson in best practice: ‘The Practice’ trade mark dispute 11 December 2024 By Jessie Shu Read on
Advertising & marketing, Intellectual Property, Social media, Trade marks Burger case bounces In-N-Out of court in meaty appeal 9 February 2021 By Diana Liu Read on
Advertising & marketing, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trade marks No mean feet obtaining a discovery order – Manolo Blahnik Worldwide Limited v Estro Concept Pty Limited 19 November 2020 By Diana Liu Read on
Advertising & marketing, Intellectual Property Ouch! Federal Court of Australia imposes $4.5 million-dollar penalty for misleading marketing of pain-relief products 3 June 2020 By Veg Tran Read on
Advertising & marketing, Intellectual Property Popping prosecco’s bubble: geographical indications and the prosecco war 23 January 2020 By Amy Z Wang Read on
Advertising & marketing, Intellectual Property Australian company ordered to pay $10 million for unacceptable advertising claims: TGA uses its power to penalise inappropriate online advertisement and sale of therapeutic goods 2 August 2019 By Veg Tran Read on
Advertising & marketing, Intellectual Property, Litigation Let’s get clinical: Federal Court of Australia examines representations about ‘clinical’ efficacy of over-the-counter deodorants 25 January 2019 By Louisa Dimarco Read on
Advertising & marketing, Intellectual Property Spinning the wheel – Star Wars Battlefront 2 brings gambling regulatory spotlight on lootboxes 22 December 2017 By Charles Davies Read on
Advertising & marketing, Intellectual Property, Trade marks Would you like rights with that? The real reason behind In-N-Out’s periodic pop-ups? 20 January 2017 By Chris Maher Read on
Advertising & marketing, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trade marks Hand over the ouzo and no one gets hurt – Little Greek Taverna enjoins use of Little Greek Cuzina, and a Cheeky restaurant case from the UK 8 September 2016 By Bill Ladas Read on
